If reliably persistent storage isn't important I've had good performance with MySQL's MEMORY (fka HEAP) table type. All the functionality of normal MySQL tables but never written to disk.
On Nov 27, 2007, at 6:32 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Nov 26, 2007 10:43 PM, namotco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What about using shared memory? ShareLite for instance. Are there >> dis/advantages? > > Unfortunately, ShareLite has terrible performance. You can nearly > always beat it with standard files or MySQL. You can beat it by miles > with Cache::FastMmap or BerkeleyDB. > > - Perrin > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Mason-users mailing list > Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
