Hi,
I used Mason1 quite a lot and recently switched to Mason2 for new projects.
I wonder what was reason for leaving the component with content syntax
in favour of "perl" lines, i.e.
why
% $.js {{
% }}
instead of
<&| $.js &>
</&>
?
In my old code I had components (methods) with content which served as
an "active markup" adding some real markup before and after block of
text without any changes to the content. Examples:
<&| SELF:javascript &>
javascript to be properly wrapped by script tag, CDATA section and
jquery onDomReady wrapper
</&>
<& SELF:elem, ($important? 'strong': ()) &>text to be empasized or not</&>
<& SELF:elem, ($active? ('a', href=>$edit_url): ()) &>text to be make
link or not</&>
I appreciated that the old syntax was visually similar to HTML markup
and could be placed (indented) accordingly.
<td><& SELF:elem, ($active? ('a', href=>$edit_url): ()) &>text to
be make link or not</&></td>
Is there some similar syntax for "active markup", not actually
changing its content, available also in Mason2?
Thanks for reply,
Roman Daniel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
