> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Allan Engelhardt <all...@cybaea.com> wrote: >> If I have a Mason component with >> >> <%class> >> use MooseX::Method::Signatures; >> ... >> </%class> >> >> then I get an unimportant but annoying warning about >> >> Prototype mismatch: sub MC0::(some component)::method (&) vs none .... >> >> that I haven't been able to remove. This is presumably because Mason uses >> Method::Signatures::Simple somewhere deep within the bowels of the beast? > > Yep. See > > https://metacpan.org/module/Mason::Component::Moose > > for more. > > >> I like to keep my log files clean: does anybody have a trick for getting rid >> of this? > > Do you really need MooseX::Method::Signatures? I don't see a way around it...
There may be a way to replace Method::Signatures::Simple with MooseX::Method::Signatures throughout Mason. I haven't given it any thought though. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
