David A. Ranch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One thing though.. what about SSH?  Obviously SSH can replace Rsh, etc
> but can it do it via > 1024 ports?

As far as I know, ssh has no requirement that the source port be < 1024,
so it should masq just fine.

-- 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox)      || "Nothing takes the taste out of peanut
sometimes known as David DeSimone  ||  butter quite like unrequited love."
  http://www.dallas.net/~fox/      ||                       -- Charlie Brown


_______________________________________________
Masq maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to