>> I did, it didn't seem to do any difference anyway so...
>
>I'd leave it at 115200 though.
I'll do that...
>
>>I don't know really, I once emailed them a few times, about a 56K
>>connection, and I seem to remember them saying somthing about a -Bay
>>networks- modem pool,
>
>Thats definately very possible. Bay (now Nortel) has made RAS gear
>for a while.
>
>
>>nobsdcomp
>>^^^^ I added this line and now my pppd rejects the query that the ISP:s
ppp
>>implementation does to use BSD compression (or Predictor 1 ?). I have a
>>module that i insmod at startup "bsd_comp", could that one be out of date
or
>>?
>
>The only remote RAS gear that supports BSD compression is other UNIX boxes.
>Most RAS hardware will only support v.42bis and STAC compression.
>
I ended up putting the modem in a Win98 box last night, and found the
connection working fine, Dial-up-networking reported STAC compression only,
no BSD or anything like that.
My theory is that somehow the pppd confused STAC compression requests as BSD
requests, and that is why it didn't work as it was supposed to...
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
