On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, David A. Ranch wrote:
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:35:07 -0800
> From: David A. Ranch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jeffery Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Masq] Starcraft and 2.2.x kernel
>
>
> >So I followed the instructions in the HOWTO to apply the
> >patch. I didn't let it scare me that the number on the loosedup patch is
> >2.0.36 and my kernel is 2.2.3 because I told you that as well and you also
> >recommended it.
>
> I've been told that the LooseUDP patch is now in the 2.2.x kernels
> but I haven't confirmed this yet.
Lines 405-408 of net/ipv4/ip_masq.c confirm it...
/*
* By default enable dest loose semantics
*/
#define CONFIG_IP_MASQ_LOOSE_DEFAULT 1
I still think it should be a proper config option, however, since
(according to something I read somewhere :) this is slightly less
secure than tight semantics.
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
