On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, David A. Ranch wrote:
>
> >Really, you recommend *against* a module kernel? I would recommend in
> >the opposite direction, actually. The main reason is that the
> >/etc/conf.modules lets you spell out which interface is eth0, eth1, and
> >what I/O, DMA, IRQ, etc. they use.
>
> Sure... you can do that in /etc/lilo.conf too. I just don't recommend
> modules because its one more thing to break, you have to run kerneld,
> etc.
I don't. I use the kmod feature of the 2.2 kernel :-)
Works like a charm.
/bart
--
"Microsoft does have a Year 2000 problem. We're it"
(c) unknown - Go Linux! http://www.linux.org/
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
