True, it's not even rlogin on the other end. It's a program that uses the protocol to
communicate (they run their "rlogin server" on port 6400). The client isn't rlogin,
it's their client. The suite of programs is called "Field Caesar". I don't know if
anyone has had experience with it but thats why SSH really wouldn't work unless this
company re-wrote their software :)
Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > There isn't a way to do it with current tools like ipautofw or
> > whatever it's called to just take ports if they are <1024 on the
> > client, to shove them out so they are <1024 as well?
> >
>
> You could use a rule to redirect you to the masquerading box at a port
> below 1024, and then use a standard netpipe to do the link from there.
> Personally I don't think rlogin is wortht he trouble when you have ssh
> substitutes available, but maybe you're dealing with legacy systems or
> something :)
>
> Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
> Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
