This is the second time I've had this happen. If you get this, the only
difference will be that this is to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' as opposed to
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
What's up?
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 09:26:43 -0700
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The
following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host garbo.nrgup.com [208.150.70.114]:
550 <dilbert.ssc.com>:
Host not found
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dill.ssc.com [192.168.1.15] (mail)
by dilbert.ssc.com with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 10dz4I-0003c1-00; Sun, 2 May 1999 09:26:14 -0700
Received: from pann by dill.ssc.com with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 10dz4I-0004K4-00; Sun, 2 May 1999 09:26:14 -0700
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 09:26:14 -0700
From: Pann McCuaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Debian 2.1 and IP masq
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, May 02, 1999 at 03:00:40AM -0700
X-Operating-System: Linux dill 2.0.36 i586
On Sat, 1 May 1999 03:00:36 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> |->>
> |->> |->> After I upgraded to Debian 2.1.0 and Linux 2.0.36, whenever I am
> |->> |->> on IRC and surfing the web, the masq server will freeze.
> |->>
> |->> I mean the "masq server" machine will freeze and require a cold boot.
> |->
> |->I think there are enough people beating on masquerade for such a long
> |->time, that it is rather unlikely that there is a software problem in the
> |->kernel causing this. You are more likely to find the problem in your
> |->hardware.
>
> To reiterate, before I moved to Debian 2.1, everything worked beautifully. I used
>Debain 1.3.1 with the exact hardware I have today in the exact configuration for
>about 6 months without a problem.
> Therefore, I doubt the hardware is an issue. My problems began when I upgraded to
>Debian 2.1(to process upgrading is like calling a root canal fun). It was then that
>the *machine* began to
> mysteriously crash whenever I was IRC and on the Web or FTP'ing and on the web. I
>have two machines on the network -- an NT 4 SP# box that also runs Debain 2.1 and an
>SGI Indigo2 running
> IRIX 6.2 with updated to April 1998 recommended patches.
>
> I have re-checked my config with the how-to's three times, as well as, rebuilding
>the kernel in two or three ways to attempt to resolve the issue. I implemented the
>more advanced firewalling rules in the
> how-to without any positive effect. Does anyone know of any issues between 2.1 and
>masquerade?
FWIW, for a _clean_ install of Debian 2.1 ipmasq just dropped in and
started working. And I do mean dropped in. Compiled a kernel with the
recommended configuration, installed the ipmasq package, and touched
_NOTHING_ except to put the ftp module in /etc/modules.
(I did have a little problem getting my second network masq'ed, but
that's a different issue).
And it's also true that no one here does anything with IRC. It's evil. ;-^>
--
Pann McCuaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] PO Box 55549, Seattle, WA 98155
Technical Manager Phone: (206) 782-7733 ext 122
SSC, Inc. www.ssc.com Fax: (206) 782-7191
Linux Journal www.linuxjournal.com
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Pann McCuaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] PO Box 55549, Seattle, WA 98155
Technical Manager Phone: (206) 782-7733 ext 122
SSC, Inc. www.ssc.com Fax: (206) 782-7191
Linux Journal www.linuxjournal.com
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tiffany.indyramp.com/mailman/listinfo/masq
Admin requests can be handled by web (above) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
