/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! */
Sounds like you've got a catch-22. Is there a reason that you can't upgrade
to the 2.2.x kernel series?
Greg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eddie Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 3:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Masq] 2.0.36 Kernel, IPCHAINS and IPPORTFW
>
>
> /* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
> before posting! */
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I currently have a masq box set up with an ipfwadm ruleset
> and ipportfw to
> allow VNC into an internal machine.
>
> I notice that David Ranch is suggesting that 2.0.x users
> patch the kernel
> and use the ipchains rules instead of ipfwadm.
>
> Investigating this, it looks like once I patch the kernel to support
> ipchains, then I can't patch in ipportfw. Also, ipmasqadm
> doesn't work on
> 2.0.x systems.
>
> So, how do I keep my current functionality while moving up to
> an ipchains
> ruleset.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eddie
>
> _______________________________________________
> Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Admin requests can be handled at
http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ -- THIS INCLUDES UNSUBSCRIBING!
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ -- THIS INCLUDES
UNSUBSCRIBING!
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
