http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/opinion/sunday/chelsea-manning-the-us-militarys-campaign-against-media-freedom.html?smid=fb-share&_r=1
editorial in NY Times For some reason every public safety agency in the USA seems to think that their radio channel info is top secret - where does this fantasy come from? - do these agencies want to hide their work from the public? - why? - if they were really concerned about "officer safety", "firefighter safety", or "terrorism prevention", would they operate the radio systems that they now have? Since every 'after action report' mentions 'radio problems', it seems reasonable to assume that the radio manufacturers would have a lot to hide - maybe they are driving all of this secrecy - maybe they dont anyone to hear how really ineffective modern public safety radio systems are Question - what is an effective radio system? - Answer - an effective radio system allows easy comms from everywhere and anywhere - (see the TV show "24" and the "Star Trek" movies) keywords - openness - systems analysis - strengths and weakness analysis - self reflection - introspection - common sense - reality -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "massfire" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/massfire. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
