https://youtu.be/Wif1EAgEQKI - 7 minute video - 1 million views in 1 day
old London - insurance companies would pay the first, second, and third arriving fire companies at a building fire so what was the purpose of having fire marks then? something still does not add up here - if the insurance companies were funding the fire companies - and the insurance companies were paying only the first, 2nd, and third arriving fire companies - what was the real purpose of the fire mark? maybe the mark just told the fire company were to send a bill for their services - without having to track down the owner and ask who his insurer was lets read the attached report and see what it says - https://www.tomscott.com/corrections/firemarks/ ah - here we go - "Insurance companies also made additional payments for hard work and bravery at fires, and made compensation awards for injury or death.[47], [48], [49], [50], [51]" so indeed - the fire mark would tell the FD where they could get money from -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "massfire" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/massfire/CAFXWwKarnNKSsupp32-ZoRaYNUwG17aw-cmy_JPtCPjgMUoMtA%40mail.gmail.com.
