Hi, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:44:28PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > Oh the irony :-) my atlas anchor is sitting quite close to what used > > to be TT12 and TT155, and both still provide Stratum-1 NTP to anyone > > who asks... > > if you are suggesting that the atlas anchor or atlas probes would do > better resolution if they chimed off that strat-1, i am not so sure. > i suspect the issues are internal to the actual probe/anchor.
No, that was more like "Atlas replaces TTM, which had nice built-in
Stratum-1 clocks, and look, my Atlas Anchor could happily use those
leftovers from TTM to get great time!" - I found it amusing.
Seriously, with the measurements Atlas does, I expect precisely synchronized
time between nodes to be much less relevant than for TTM - for one-way
measurements, it needs to be as precise as you can get, for "send a packet
and wait until the answer comes", having something in the 0.1 second
precision range strikes me as "good enough to find the measurement in
question in the log".
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgphlsjGYB4jY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
