Hi Brian, all, On Mon 4 Apr 2022, 12:00, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote: > > (As chair, running the consensus process) No, there is no reason not > > to go with three co-chairs for the next term; indeed (as a chair, > > stepping down, who has had fun with meeting logistics, and is an SRE > > at $dayjob) three chairs would in some ways be preferable, as it > > gives n+1 chair redundancy in addition to a breadth of perspective > > on measurement topics.
Agreed, especially on your last point. And in that case (just to be explicit): +1 for both Massimo and Stephen. Thanks, luuk -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/mat-wg
