On 17/12/2022 00:19, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote:
On Dec 16, 2022, at 23:29, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:
There is a larger problem here, a more strategic one: such a feature
would contribute to the centralisation of the Internet, which is
already too important. Tagging some targets are "important" and
"worthy of measurements" would mean that we consider some HTTP servers
to be more useful than others. That would be a bad message from RIPE.
We’ve come full circle - we started with centralized PTTs - moved to a
decentralized ASN/Paul Baran model - now Re-centralized based on marketing
domination.
+1 with Stephane’s observation. The selection of who to measure is a statement.
+1
Also, while the data would be useful, I don't think the role of the ripe
ncc is to grade commercial services. Let other companies or individual
researchers do that.
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/mat-wg
