On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 03:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Jakub Lach <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you are saying that you are using Mate on FreeBSD, don't hesitate > and make a port :) Not yet, unfortunately. I only wondered if we should start to focus on Maté and adopt it in the near future. > About Trinity, they biggest problem is that they want to port > kde3 to qt4, unnecessary imho. They should focus on > legacy desktops + maintain qt33. And they only have 5 > contributors. > > And attracting rather strange crowd... > > http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::3095 > > PS. http://www.trinitydesktop.org/wiki/bin/view/Developers/RoadMap > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-MATE-GNOME2-Project-News-tp5622414p5716464.html > Sent from the freebsd-chat mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Matede-velopment mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matede-velopment
