*********************************
 From the NASSMC Briefing Service (NBS) that is provided by the 
National Alliance of State
Science & Mathematics Coalitions through grants from the ExxonMobil 
Foundation and the National Security Agency (NSA). Wednesday, July 
18, 2001, See http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/13/politics/13EDUC.html 
for the original source of the first item below, and 
http://24hour.sacbee.com/24hour/nation/story/629378p-675387c.html 
for the second.
*********************************

School Heads See Problems In Legislation

Superintendents of two of the nation's largest school systems told the National
Press Club Thursday that the accountability measures pending in Congress could
have an unintended effect: driving down educational standards.

Because the bills include tough sanctions for districts that do not bring all
students up to proficiency within a certain time period, local 
authorities might
be tempted to dilute state standards to make it easier to meet the 
requirements,
warned Roy Romer, superintendent of schools in Los Angeles.

"You'll have people out there gaming the system," Romer said.

Both the House and Senate bills would allow states to define 
proficiency and how
to measure it.

Harold Levy, chancellor of the New York City schools, said many of the ideas
being discussed in Congress are already under way in New York. His experience
has been that improvements in student achievement are correlated more with
teacher quality than with magnet schools or annual testing. Congress, he said,
must provide more money to enable districts to attract qualified teachers.

"If the system's accountable, then I say the politicians and policy makers also
have to be accountable," Levy said.

SOURCE: New York Times, 13 July 2001 (p. A10)

---------------
Pennsylvania Board of Education OKs science standards

The Pennsylvania Board of Education approved the state's first 
science standards
Thursday. The board voted 13-2 to approve the standards after changing wording
that could have led to the teaching of creationism throughout the 
state's public
schools.

An earlier version of the standards called for students to "analyze evidence of
fossil records, similarities in body structures, embryological studies and DNA
studies that support or do not support the theory of evolution."

The version approved by the board requires students to "analyze data 
from fossil
records, similarities in anatomy and physiology, embryological studies and DNA
studies that are relevant to the theory of evolution."

The standards outline what students should know by the end of grades four,
seven, 10 and 12.

SOURCE: Sacramento Bee (Associated Press), 12 July 2001
***************************************************
-- 
Jerry P.Becker
Department of Curriculum & Instruction
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, IL  62901-4610  USA
Phone:  (618) 453-4241  [O]
             (618)  457-8903 [H]
Fax:      (618) 453-4244
E-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----------------------------------------------------
This is the CPS Mathematics Teacher Discussion List. 

To unsubscribe, send a message to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

For more information:
<http://home.sprintmail.com/~mikelach/subscribe.html>.

To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/science%40lists.csi.cps.k12.il.us/>

Reply via email to