On Thursday 02 August 2007 10:42:17 am John Hunter wrote:
> On 8/2/07, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know if we ever reached consensus on how to specify math text
> > vs. regular text. I agree with Eric that it's down to two options:
> > using a new kw argument (probably format="math" to be most future-proof)
> > or Math('string'). I don't think I have enough "historical perspective"
> > to really make the call but I do have a concern about the second option
> > that it may be confusing depending on how "Math" is imported. (It may
> > have to be pylab.Math in some instances but not in others.) But I don't
> > have a strong objection.
> >
> > Any last objections to going with the new keyword argument?
>
> I'm +1 on the kwarg approach -- it seems most consistent with our other
> usage.
Maybe the keyword should be format="TeX"? Or texformatting=True? Maybe it
would be appropriate to have the kwarg default to None, and if None reference
an rcoption like text.texformatting? That might be the least disruptive all
around.
Darren
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
