John Hunter wrote: > I'm not too keen on having general math in one module and matlab > compatible math in another, in part because this will be confusing to > folks not too familiar with matlab, and as time passes (I never use it > anymore) that is starting to include me. I think we could avoid some > confusion by simply fixing the docstring in mlab. So I'd rather put > all the math stuff in mlab, and possibly pull the geometry specific > stuff into a separate module. > FWIW, there are also a number of C++ geometry functions in _path.cpp that perhaps should be considered in this reorg.
(But I'm just catching up on thousands of e-mails today, so I won't comment on the reorg itself <wink>) Cheers, Mike -- Michael Droettboom Science Software Branch Operations and Engineering Division Space Telescope Science Institute Operated by AURA for NASA ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
