Eric Firing wrote:
> Jozef Vesely wrote:
>   
>> Hello matplotlib developers,
>>
>> I have implemented "svg.image_noscale" feature for ps and pdf backends. I 
>> think
>> that resampling/scaling should be avoided, when vector format can scale image
>> itself.
>>     
Unfortunately, the quality of interpolation is often subpar compared to 
what matplotlib (via Agg) provides.  Worse, the quality will be 
different when using Acrobat Reader vs. xpdf, for instance.  I don't 
think zooming in on individual pixels of data in Acroread is something 
we really are trying to support anyway -- for that you should use an 
interactive matplotlib GUI.  The purpose of pdf, imho, is really for 
printing.  In that case, you're likely to get better results and smaller 
file sizes by knowing the maximum resolution of your output device and 
letting matplotlib resample it -- and resample it with a method that is 
appropriate for the data, not the one in the printer or Acrobat that is 
(probably) optimized for photographs of the real world or whatever the 
driver is currently set to.
> It seems to me best if there is an option to scale or not; depending on 
> the situation, one might want to generate a file with images downscaled.
>   
Right.  All the above notwithstanding, I don't have a problem with this 
being a user option, I just can't imagine using it myself.
>   
>> One advantage is that original image can be recovered from final file. 
>> Moreover
>> as it is vector format it should be dpi independent and always provide 
>> maximum
>> possible quality - that's original data.
>>     
The original image can theoretically be recovered from the final file.  
But not the original data, which may be floating point etc.  If you 
anticipate users of your plot to need the original data, just distribute 
the original data alongside the plot.
>> As for svg backend I have commented some transformation changes which 
>> I don't understand and which result in misaligned image and axes. 
>> Without it the misalignment is still there but smaller.
>>     
Thanks for that.  I'm not sure why that code is there.  I see it looks 
much better without it.
>> I have also removed MixedModeRenderer from svg as it conflicts with 
>> "svg.image_noscale"
>> and does not seem to be used.
>>     
I think it would be better to turn off mixed mode rendering only when 
svg.image_noscale is True.
>>     
>
> I think having the option of using the MixedModeRenderer is important in 
> the long run for the vector backends; without it, one can end up with 
> completely unwieldy and potentially unrenderable files.  I'm not sure 
> what its status is at present; I think Mike got it working to a 
> considerable extent, but didn't quite finish, and therefore left it 
> temporarily disabled.
>   
It's fully functional in all the backends where it makes sense.  The 
part that is unfinished is the user interface -- how to turn the 
functionality on and off.  We couldn't find both a general and easy way 
to do it.  But it would be nice to have another go at it.

Mike

-- 
Michael Droettboom
Science Software Branch
Operations and Engineering Division
Space Telescope Science Institute
Operated by AURA for NASA


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Reply via email to