On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi!
> some days ago there was a thread about new matplotlib release, but it
> seems there is some problem about windows binary pacakges preparation.
>
> Is this situation evolved a bit? Would it be considerable to do a
> source-only release (there are a lot of changes in the svn that our
> users would like to see), and then work on binary packages?
>
Yes, we had problems with both the OSX and win32 builds, which we have not
resolved yet unfortunately. The problem with a "source only" release is
that on the sf download site, users will be directed to the latest release,
and there will be no binaries available there. I suppose we could reupload
the old binaries there, but I would prefer to et these issues resolved. I
have had a crazy few weeks (first vacation, then my mom broke both her arms
on vavation with me requiring surgery on both sides, and I've been spending
time with her helping her recover), and I am just starting to get back into
normal life here (meaning I'm behind on non-mpl things as well)
JDH
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
