Hallo Panagis,
and thanks for your answer.
so just making the mpc.gen(:,6)=0 will disregard the constraint without having
to change the impedance. This is great.
and if for example I do not want the transformers to be a bottleneck, can I
just make their 6th column 0 while keeping the same correct value for the line
branches?
Thanks a lot.
Vagelis
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 12:12:52 +0200
> Subject: Re: Disregard the branch constraints
> From: pana...@gmail.com
> To: matpower-l@list.cornell.edu
>
> Dear Vagelis,
>
> I think there is no flow constraint if you set the MVA limit to 0 in
> "branches". I remember such an if/case in the code, but I am not sure
> if this is about the constraint.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Panagis Vovos
>
> On 5 December 2012 20:52, Evangelos Galinas <vagelisgali...@msn.com> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I have a small question regarding the max P constraints of the branches.
> >
> > With Regard to how matPower is implemented, how would be better to disregard
> > the branch constraints?
> >
> > I cannot just make the constraints too high (e.g. 9999) because the R and X
> > do not change so this will affect the flow.
> >
> > So, does multiplying the branch's actual limit by 10 and at the same time
> > decreasing its R and X tenfold solve the issue?
> >
> > Isn't that the correct way to simulate a second // branch to the initial
> > one? (i.e. Pmax (x)2 and R (/)2 X (/)2 )
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vagelis
> >
> >
>
