Victor,

Please, ask the question clearly...


2014-05-04 8:46 GMT-05:00 chukwudi victor <suvichtech0...@yahoo.com>:

>  *Thanks so much, I need one more thing. What using MATPOWER to calculate
> the loss sensitivity index. The book am reading quoted MATPOWER. See
> attached .I really need help*
>
> *Victor*
>   On Sunday, 4 May 2014, 5:02, "Abhyankar, Shrirang G." <
> abhy...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>  MATPOWER cannot model FACTS devices or solve combinatorial problems such
> as optimal location.
>
> Shri
>
> From:  chukwudi victor <suvichtech0...@yahoo.com>
> Reply-To:  MATPOWER discussion forum <matpowe...@list.cornell.edu>
> Date:  Sun, 4 May 2014 12:37:06 +0100
> To:  MATPOWER discussion forum <matpowe...@list.cornell.edu>
> Subject:  Re: Reply to: test_matpower yields error
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > I am doing a project that I need to calculate the best location to
> >install FACTS to relief transmission congestion, Pls can some one help me
> >.
> >
> >
> >Victor
> >
> >    On Friday, 2 May 2014, 13:25, Ray Zimmerman <r...@cornell.edu> wrote:
> >
> >  The issue is the overridden versions of linprog and quadprog. I simply
> >rename or move these two files (in the MOSEK distribution) so they are no
> >longer in the Matlab path.
> > This allows me to use both MOSEK, by calling it directly and the
> >Optimization Toolbox routines linprog and quadprog, without having to
> >constantly mess with my path.
> >    Ray
> >
> >
> >On May 2, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Sohail Khan <sohail.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Dear Uriel,
> >Thank you!
> >
> >With your information, i have found a solution for using the required
> > facility of mosek when required by including the path at the run time
> >and removing it when necessary.
> >
> >For more details. See http://www.alecjacobson.com/weblog/?p=1639
> >
> >Best wishes
> >Sohail
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Uriel Fernando Sandoval
> ><uriel_sando...@ieee.org> wrote:
> >
> >Dear Sohail,
> >I think Matlab was using "optimset" Mosek function instead the Matlab
> >built in function. Both have the same name.
> >
> >Regards
> >Uriel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >El 02/05/2014, a las 04:34, Sohail Khan <sohail.c...@gmail.com> escribió:
> >
> >
> >Dear fellows,
> >
> >I was facing error while running the runtest_matpower. Please find the
> >details at the end.
> >
> >The problem is resolved by removing the path to mosek optimization
> >toolbox. Now the test_matpower works fine.
> >
> >I don't know what caused this error. Please reply if you know a
> >workaround of using Mosek and Matpower simultaneously.
> >
> >
> >
> >Best wishes
> >
> >Sohail
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >--------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >In response to my email:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I have followed the installation steps on Matlab but when i
> >runtest_matpowerfollowing error is emerged.t_loadcase..........ok
> >t_ext2int2ext.......ok
> >t_jacobian..........ok
> >t_hessian...........ok
> >t_totcost...........ok
> >t_modcost...........ok
> >t_hasPQcap..........ok
> >t_mips..............ok
> >t_qps_matpower......??? Error using ==> optimset at 181
> >Invalid value for OPTIONS parameter MaxNodes: must be a real non-negative
> >integer.
> >
> >Error in ==> qps_ot at 229
> >        ot_opt = optimset('linprog');
> >
> >Error in ==> qps_matpower at 240
> >        [x, f, eflag, output, lambda] = ...
> >
> >Error in ==> t_qps_matpower at 78
> >        [x, f, s, out, lam] = qps_matpower([], c, A, l, u, xmin, [], [],
> >opt);
> >
> >Error in ==> t_run_tests at 79
> >    feval( test_names{k}, ~verbose );
> >
> >Error in ==> test_matpower at 135
> >t_run_tests( tests, verbose );
> >
> >I have installed following toolboxes in Matlab:
> >
> >YALMIP
> >MOSEK
> >SEDUMI
> >
> >Following is the version information:
> >MATLAB R2010a
> >Matpower 4.1
> >
> >Please guide me how this error can be removed. Thank you!
> >
> >Best wishes
> >Sohail
> >
> >PhD student
> >Austrian Institute of Technology
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to