Hello Akash

You might want to try the function *Losses=get_losses(results) . *It
computes branch series losses and optionally also returns reactive
injections from line charging as functions of bus voltages and branch
parameters.


Thanks,

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Akash Tyagi <akashtyagi0...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Below is the attached file of the results of the case9ab.
> The values for P (MW) are calculated by PF and PT.
> My question is how Q(MVAR) LOSS is calculated in the attached file in the
> last column, Is there any formula to calculate the the Q?
>
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Akash Tyagi <akashtyagi0...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The results are still not coming.
>> I have run the normal power flow and then see the values in the command
>> window.
>> P(real power loss) is calculated by PF and PT by the following command-
>> real_power_loss=results.bracnh(:,PF)+results.branch(:,PT);
>> The results are same as given in the command window for P(MW) for
>> different branches.
>> how the Q(reactive Power loss) is calculated ??
>> It is not giving the same results as done for the real power loss.
>> reactive_power_loss=results.branch(:,QF)+results.branch(:,QT);
>> The values are different by using the above command and also it is not
>> same in the command window for Q(MVAR)
>>
>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Bone, Gorazd <gorazd.b...@fe.uni-lj.si>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Akash,
>>>
>>> is it possible that the problem is with the shunt capacitances. I
>>> suggest you calculate the line currents (from ohm's law) and then Qloss =
>>> X*I^2.
>>>
>>> regards
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *Od:* bounce-121528073-78499...@list.cornell.edu [
>>> bounce-121528073-78499...@list.cornell.edu] v imenu Akash Tyagi [
>>> akashtyagi0...@gmail.com]
>>> *Poslano:* 14. maj 2017 9:46
>>> *Za:* MATPOWER discussion forum
>>> *Zadeva:* Reactive power Loss
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> I am working on my project and I got stuck with reactive power loss.
>>> I was trying to calculate the reactive power loss for all the branches.
>>> I have given the following case below-
>>> I run the normal power flow for  the case attached below by the
>>> following command- << runpf (case9ab)
>>> After then I have to calculate the reactive power loss by using the
>>> following command-
>>> reactive_power_loss=results.br
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__results.br&d=DwMFaQ&c=ODFT-G5SujMiGrKuoJJjVg&r=FrRmAo_pr5URbIuBK7LUda4uMUvmCsV_CJMIoeZcq8E&m=S2EgfdRrCqp1E48Jlerjl7Z7THn_qFbuCpOhmMZIKBg&s=_bJjTwRJu0e7k8vG0UxsvMBueJr20q1_CqtRMyWOaBE&e=>
>>> anch(:,QF)+results.branch(:,QT)
>>> But it is not giving the same results as coming after power flow in the
>>> command window.
>>> My Question is how to calculate the reactive power loss values (Q (MVAR)
>>> ) as given in the branch data after power flow.
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
*Aaqib A Peerzada*
*Graduate Student *
*Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering*
*Wisenbaker Engineering Research Center*
*Texas A&M University*
*College Station, Texas*
*United States.*
*Phone # 979-739-2799*
*Email: peerz...@tamu.edu <peerz...@tamu.edu>*

Reply via email to