Thank you for your timely and valuable answers.
Now I have my own answer with your help. In PDIPM method, the OPF solving 
process updates four variables (Pg, Qg, Um and Ua) simultaneously and obtain 
the best solution finally. The equation constraints (PF equations) don’t need 
to be satisfied during the iteration process, but at the solution.  So there is 
no complete PF solving process in the OPF solving process by PDIPM.

Thanks very much!

Best Wishes,
Walter

________________________________
From: bounce-122001212-79707...@list.cornell.edu 
<bounce-122001212-79707...@list.cornell.edu> on behalf of Ray Zimmerman 
<r...@cornell.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:56:21 AM
To: MATPOWER discussion forum
Subject: Re: A problem about the relationship between PF and OPF solving process

The answer to your question is No. The reason is that the power flow equations 
are included as equality constraints in the OPF problem, which is formulated as 
a nonlinear programming problem (NLP). When using a primal-dual interior point 
solver for an NLP, the equality constraints are not typically satisfied at 
every iteration, only at the solution. For more details on the formulation and 
algorithm, see Section 3.4 in the MIPS User’s 
Manual<http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/MIPS-manual-1.2.2.pdf> or 
Appendix A.4 in the MATPOWER User’s 
Manual<http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/MATPOWER-manual-6.0.pdf>.

    Ray


On Oct 30, 2017, at 5:35 AM, Sun Weigao 
<sunwei...@outlook.com<mailto:sunwei...@outlook.com>> wrote:

Dear Matpower users,

I have a confusing problem when I am doing some research to improve the 
optimization of PF problem and OPF problem both.

I solve the PF problem by Newton-Rapfson (NR) method, and OPF problem by 
Primal-dual Interior Point method (PDIPM). I want to figure out the 
relationship between the PF and OPF solving process.

Do we need a complete PF solving process (using NR) during the OPF solving 
process (using PDIPM)? In other words, Does the solving process of the OPF 
problem (using PDIPM) contains many PF calculations? If Yes,  in which step the 
PF is calculated ? and if No, why ?

I've been puzzled by this problem for a long time, please help if you clear the 
answer.
Thank you very much.

Sincerely,
Walter



Reply via email to