Ok Doctor, I'll give it a try that way.

Thank you,

Carlos

El lun., 18 mar. 2019 a las 21:12, Ray Zimmerman (<[email protected]>)
escribió:

> That is a MATLAB bug in their intlinprog() function. I would recommend
> using Gurobi or CPLEX for running MOST. I prefer Gurobi
> <https://user.gurobi.com/download/licenses/free-academic>. It is free for
> academic use.
>
>    Ray
>
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2019, at 2:20 PM, Carlos Ferrandon Cervantes <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you Doctor for your responses. I've been testing the software with
> different values of reserve. I am using the 24 RTS bus. There is a point
> when I am increasing the minimum reserve in the system when I get this
> error:
>
> Error using intlinprog (line 142)
> INTLINPROG encountered an internal error that caused the solution to lose
> integer and/or linear constraint
> feasibility. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> Please contact technical support for assistance with your problem, quoting
> the code "-2_4".
>
> Error in miqps_ot (line 281)
>             intlinprog(c, intcon, Ai, bi, Ae, be, xmin, xmax, ot_opt);
>
> Error in miqps_matpower (line 220)
>             miqps_ot(H, c, A, l, u, xmin, xmax, x0, vtype, opt);
>
> Error in most (line 2154)
>             mdo.QP.lambda ] = miqps_matpower( mdi.QP.H, mdi.QP.C, ...
>
> Error in most_ex6_uc_DCFULL (line 117)
> mdo = most(mdi, mpopt);
>
> I've noticed that the lower bound compared to the Optimal objective value
> is somewhat far from each other. I dont know what this error means.
>
> Thank you as usual in advance,
>
> Carlos
>
> El mié., 13 mar. 2019 a las 19:42, Ray Zimmerman (<[email protected]>)
> escribió:
>
>> 1. For a deterministic case, you want to use the default values for
>> contingency constraint parameters in the xGen data, since they are not
>> relevant when there is a single state per period. Technically, in the
>> implementation they are independent, so it is possible to include both, but
>> the contingency constraints make no sense and have no impact on the
>> deterministic case. See the footnote on p. 35 of the MOST User’s Manual
>> <http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/MOST-manual-1.0.1.pdf>.
>>
>> 2. Yes. See equations (7.2)–(7.5) in the MATPOWER User’s Manual
>> <http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/MATPOWER-manual-7.0b1.pdf> for
>> the formulation.
>>
>>    Ray
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 13, 2019, at 12:37 PM, Carlos Ferrandon Cervantes <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Doctor for your response. I coded it that way just before
>> calling  most(mdi, mpopt) and it worked well and I've compared the
>> results with fixed reserves and without. Now I have the following questions:
>>
>> 1. About the reserves, for a UC optimisation I had been using loadxgendata('
>> ',mpc) but now after adding   mdi.FixedReserves(t,1,1)= mpc.reserves  I
>> wonder which one has the priority in the problem. Does one deactivate the
>> other? Or what is the action here from the program.
>>
>> 2. Also, does the zonal value of reserve mpc.reserves.req  is the
>> minimum reserve that all generators allocated to certain zone in 
>> mpc.reserves.zones
>>  have to meet for the system?
>>
>> Thank you so much in advance,
>>
>> Carlos Ferrandon
>>
>>
>> El lun., 11 mar. 2019 a las 15:48, Ray Zimmerman (<[email protected]>)
>> escribió:
>>
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>
>>> Sorry the documentation for this isn’t better. For fixed zonal reserves,
>>> MOST uses the basic structure used by MATPOWER and described in section
>>> 7.6.1 of the MATPOWER User’s Manual
>>> <http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/MATPOWER-manual-7.0b1.pdf>.
>>> You will need to essentially specify the mpc.reserves structure for
>>> each period for MOST. After using loadmd() to create a MOST input data
>>> structure mdi, simply assign the corresponding to mpc.reserves to 
>>> mdi.FixedReserves(t,
>>> 1, 1) for each period t.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>>
>>>     Ray
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 10, 2019, at 11:57 AM, Carlos Ferrandon Cervantes <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Doctor:
>>>
>>> I'm running a unit commitment (UC) simulation and I'm looking to set a
>>> minimum variable value of MW of reserve for the whole system per each time
>>> step (t) of the simulation. Assuming it is a 24hr simulation there could be
>>> 24 different values of minimum MW of reserve connected to the system. Do
>>> you have an idea how this can be performed in MOST?
>>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance
>>>
>>> Carlos Ferrandon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos Ferrandon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Ferrandon
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Ferrandon
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Ferrandon

Reply via email to