Hi Nitya,

I tried your network and it converged; I am using MATPOWER 6.1.

Kind regards,

Ilias Sarantakos
PhD Student
Newcastle University
UK

Στις Τρί, 9 Απρ 2019 στις 9:19 π.μ., ο/η Nitya Kirana <
nityakirana...@gmail.com> έγραψε:

> Dear Fiaz Ahmad,
>
> I actually have run the simulation for IEEE 33 bus, 16 bus, and 69 bus
> using Newton Raphson method and the result is convergen. And also in IEEE
> 33 bus it has the ratio R/X greater than mine, so I just think that the
> problem is not the Newton Raphson method. Anw, thank you for your
> recommendation.
>
>
> *Best Regards, *
>
> *Putu Diah Nitya Kirana,*
>
> Assistant and Researcher at Electric Energy Conversion Laboratory B101
> Electrical Engineering Department
> Faculty of Electrical Technology
> Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
> Surabaya, Indonesia
>
> +62 8170 3178 248
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 11:54, Fiaz Ahmad <fiazah...@sabanciuniv.edu> wrote:
>
>> Dear Nitya use forward-backward sweep algorithm for the power flow of
>> this system.
>>
>>
>> Have a nice day
>>
>> Regards,
>> DR. FIAZ AHMAD
>> PhD Mechatronics Engineering (Sabanci University, Istanbul Turkey),
>> Mob: 0092-332-9124525,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 9:51 AM Nitya Kirana <nityakirana...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Fiaz Ahmad,
>>>
>>> Okay thank you, so what's your recommendation for this power system
>>> analysis method?
>>> *Best Regards,*
>>>
>>> *Putu Diah Nitya Kirana,*
>>>
>>> Assistant and Researcher at Electric Energy Conversion Laboratory B101
>>> Electrical Engineering Department
>>> Faculty of Electrical Technology
>>> Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
>>> Surabaya, Indonesia
>>>
>>> +62 8170 3178 248
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 01:04, Fiaz Ahmad <fiazah...@sabanciuniv.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Normally Newton Raphson method doesn't converge for distribution
>>>> systems due to high r/x ratios
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 22:48 Carlos A. Castro <ccas...@unicamp.br> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Nitya
>>>>>
>>>>> I would do two things:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. I would replace all commas "," by points "." in the data file.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. I would try to draw the one line diagram of the network based on
>>>>> the data, to check whether the network is all connected, that is, that
>>>>> there are no isolated buses or group of buses,
>>>>>
>>>>> Good luck,
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 14:42, Nitya Kirana <
>>>>> nityakirana...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have run the power flow of 64 radial test bus system using Newton
>>>>>> Raphson in Matpower 4.1. It shows the result of power losses but it
>>>>>> doesn't converge, whenever I run the matlab, the result is always
>>>>>> different, and I don't know what's the problem. Can anyone help me? 
>>>>>> because
>>>>>> this is my final project. It shows "Warning: Matrix is singular to
>>>>>> working precision."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, here is my data :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bus data
>>>>>>          bus               type    Pd          Qd               Gs Bs
>>>>>> area Vm            Va baseKV zone        Vmax          Vmin
>>>>>> 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 4 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 5 1 0,0204 0,024384 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 7 1 0,07684 0,091846 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 8 1 0,02856 0,034138 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 9 1 0,03808 0,045517 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 10 1 0,0238 0,028448 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 11 1 0,01768 0,021133 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 12 1 0,017 0,02032 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 13 1 0,022304 0,02666 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 14 1 0,0204 0,002438 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 15 1 0,05848 0,069901 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 16 1 0,26384 0,315366 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 17 1 0,03774 0,04511 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 18 1 0,0204 0,002438 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 19 1 0,05576 0,06665 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 20 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 21 1 0,0306 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 22 1 0,0204 0,024384 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 23 1 0,0272 0,032512 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 24 1 0,11764 0,140614 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 25 1 0,0068 0,008128 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 26 1 0,0136 0,016256 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 27 1 0,0238 0,028448 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 28 1 0,112948 0,135006 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 29 1 0,02176 0,02601 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 30 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 31 1 0,01768 0,021133 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 32 1 0,05168 0,061773 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 33 1 0,03468 0,041453 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 34 1 0,02856 0,034138 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 35 1 0,0272 0,032512 0 0 1 1 0 20 1 1 0,9
>>>>>> 36 1 0,01768 0,021133</fon
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to