I am feeling like loadercli is not getting attention it needs.  I've posted several 
topics related to it and wasted a lot of time due to design 
problems I have reported.  Is no one at SAP / MySQL actively taking this topic and 
responding on the list?

Interesting discovery I made regarding loadercli:

Our FULL database backups are around 12GB in size without logs.  Using high 
compression schemes we can get this file down to 2GB.  Here is 
output from "info state":
  Data           (KB)     = 11787600
  Perm Data      (KB)     = 11787280
  Temp Data      (KB)     = 320
  Data        (Pages)     = 1473450
  Perm Data   (Pages)     = 1473410
  Temp Data   (Pages)     = 40
  Data            (%)     = 56

I found that using tableextract PAGES of all tables I get 4.7GB.  Is this because the 
indexes are left behind?  12GB vs 4.7GB is pretty big 
difference.

Furthermore, this 4.7GB compresses to an amazing 700MB!  This is a big deal for us, as 
our database recovery / backup often requires us to 
download over the internet using a 512Kbps link.. and 2.5GB vs. 700MB saves a lot of 
time.

These dramatic differences in space required and I/O performed make loadercli 
attractive as a backup solution in some situations.  However, 
the table locking...

I understand all the issues of trying to do 'real backups' and the need to consider 
the ongoing activity / logging.  However, I am sure I'm not 
the only one who wants a better solution for 'snapshot' of production database.  I 
don't care about the activity  goes on during backups... or 
inconsistencies.

The inability to do a backup and restore to an alternate platform creates this desire. 
 If it were possible to do a backup on Windows 2000 and 
restore directly on Solaris I wouldn't have  been spending so much time or concern on 
loadercli ...

Thank you.

  Stephen Gutknecht





On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:45:23 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

>
>Hi,
>
>We seem to have discovered that loadercli tableextract locks the table it is 
>extracting.
>
>we can do a backup disk to disk, but tablextract disk to disk causes all the clients 
>to halt.
>
>Is there a way to tell loadercli to not do this and act more like the backup?
>
>Thank you.
>
>  Stephen Gutknecht
>





-- 
MaxDB Discussion Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to