Hello Henrik, Our instance isn't for SAP. ;-)) Just found this param a few minutes ago and switched to no.
The Data is evenly distributed. (5Gig <> 5.1 Gig). Both volumes were enabled and active during the migration (if you meant that with 'attached'). Regards, Flo > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Henrik Hempelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2004 14:43 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: AW: SDBUPD Error. cannot stat x_server althoug > x_server was > started sucessfully > > > Florian Schmitz wrote: > > Hmm, i'm a bit disappointed now. > > We suffer big performance-loses after the migration. > > what confuses me : > > we got two data-volumes. on 7.3 both showed almost an equal > distribution of > > i/o-load > > now, volume 1 is doing 99% of io's. (300k reads to 15(no k)) > > Florian, > is the data evenly distributed over the attached volumes? > Please have a look at the 'datavolumes' system table .. > Were both volumes attached during the migration of the database? > > > > > _SERVERDB_FOR_SAP YES > .. you should open an OSS message :-) > > > Henrik > > > > > > -- > MaxDB Discussion Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb > To unsubscribe: > http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- MaxDB Discussion Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
