On 9/18/05, Peter Speltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Speaking of the roadmap, In regards to forms and  processing which is
> still inadequate if not broken at the moment, Where are you guys on
> this?  I have cleaned up SuperModel.pm and fixed code and stupid
> things that long needed fixing.  Now it is a  general, powerful, and
> fairly clean solution  to form processing and uses neither
> CGI::Untaint or FromCGI.  It  is almost  backward compatible.    I
> will post a  demo site this week where you can see it and AsForm in
> action along with a few model classes   that have many relationships,
> and the latest SuperModel.pm.  I'd figure I 'd start the discussion
> now.  My view, still unchanged, is I would like to see the
> functionality you see in the demo to be core Maypole.

[ snip ]

I like the sound of this, but I'd like to see a few failing test cases
to be clear about what's being fixed. Should be straightforward with
Test::WWW::Mech::Maypole ;-)

Got to say I'm not a fan of the name though :-(

d.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Maypole-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-devel

Reply via email to