David Baird wrote:
On 9/26/05, Aaron Trevena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/26/05, David Baird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been stashing modifications to Maypole.pm away for some time, I
think it's time to show them.
I've just had a quick look and it covers several things I wanted to
do, especially the 'done' flag.
This is one of those moments where I haven't got a clue about the issue!
I don't understand what the done flag is for, and even less what the
requirements for _run_workflow and all its friends are. So to me it all
just seems to complicate things :(
I'd like to keep headers_in and headers_out possibly you could access
them directly or through seperate request and response objects that
provides handy 'stuff' *waves hands*.
Yes, there are request and response objects encapsulated in the new
code (HTTP::Request and HTTP::Response).
>
I think documenting, clarifying and reworking the workflow are
essential for 2.12 before we do anything else on it. I think mucking
about with workflow before 2.11 leaves us too little time to get out
the essential work on ease of use for beginners.
I'd like to see documenting and clarifying first :) I'd offer to do
documenting, but until I get to the point where I can understand what's
important and what isn't - e.g. the 'done' flag - I don't see much that
I could contribute.
FWIW, the first major change I'd like to see is the separation of
request and controller.
Cheers, Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Maypole-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-devel
