On 10/3/05, Dave Howorth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Baird wrote: > > > Maypole::call_authenticate() ends with this: > > > > $r->authenticate($r); # Interface consistency is a Good Thing > > > > Can we drop the ($r)? What's it there for? > > I actually thought the comment explained it pretty well, especially in > the context of the immediately preceding statement. > > If you add an authenticate method to a model class, it has two > parameters: the invocant (the model class) and the request. > > So if you override the authenticate method in the driver class, it has > the same two parameters: the invocant (the driver) and the request. > > Made sense to Simon C and it makes sense to me. It will make even more > sense if we do eventually separate the driver and request :) > > Cheers, Dave
That does make a strange kind of sense. d. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Maypole-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-devel
