Peter Speltz wrote:
On 2/22/06, Dave Howorth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aaron Trevena wrote:
a CDBI API change
What version of CDBI will Maypole 2.11 be released against? In
particular will it be a 'stable' version (there hasn't been one released
since 0.96 AFAIK)
Thanks, Dave
Good question. Not sure what the CDBI Api change aaron is talknig
about.. It may be Maypole::Model::CDBI change. AFIK , the only thing
affected in my app by newer CDBI 3.XX versions was the macros
template which uses accessor_name which is supposed to be deprecated
but apparently does work at all. Someone posted a bug on it and no
reply from Tony so it could be user error .
Anyway, internally, Maypole::Model::CDBI is pretty basic CDBI and
should work with any version. Templates could easily be modified to
call [% accessor_name_for | accessor_name %] .
Yeah, I make pretty heavy use of accessor_name. What I need to know is
that I won't be committing to an endless cycle of minor upgrades because
of some less-than-well-developed feature in the minor releases.
Cheers, Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Maypole-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-devel
