On 11/1/05, Peter Speltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well after talking with Randal L. Schwartz from CDBI list, i'm > convinced changing the name of the Maypole action is the only sane > approach. It really is insane to have an action named the same as a > CDBI contstructor . I filed a bug report about the incompatibility > with IsA. > > Would any users complain if search and delete were renamed?
Would an alias work for this.. I think search and delete are likely to appear in a lot of code and a lot of places - aliasing them to avoid them being wiped out could work correctly - then look at marking them as deprecated and moving all default method names to do_foo could work. Any feedback on that? A. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Maypole-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-users
