On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 11:09 -0600, Peter Speltz wrote: > In general, I believe you. . But, for Class::DBI, ???
The sub to make your own accessor for a primary key is basically a one- liner. I don't see why it's such a big deal. You could even add this to Class::DBI pretty simply if you wanted to. > This is mainly true when you need the meta_info > perhaps as accessors to related rows from tables of any sort are easy > as just call retrieve as you have pointed out. Yes, I have no use for meta_info, so that isn't an issue for me. - Perrin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Maypole-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-users
