Le 18 août 11 à 13:37, Christian Schmitz a écrit: > Am 18.08.2011 um 13:34 schrieb Arnaud Nicolet: > >> Hello, >> >> What was the difference between Comment, CommentClassicMBS and >> CommentCarbonMBS? > > We had an implementation to get/set comment on Mac OS 9 and one for > Mac OS X. > CommentMBS called the right one for you. > > So CommentMBS and CommentClassicMBS are gone and CommentCarbonMBS is > renamed to CommentMBS.
Ok, thanks for the explanation, but it's still not clear to me. So it seems there were 2 different API (one per "OS" family), but were them accessing the same comment in the file? Perhaps my question would need an example... One file's metadata may consist of either this: <other>OS9Comment<other>MacOSXComment<other> or <other>Comment<other> (namely, it's all about knowing if there's a Spotlight comment in Mac OS X, which would be different than Mac OS 9's comment), or not). In both cases, 2 different API may be needed to get the comment (because the API would be different on both systems) but in the latter case, both API would access the same comment while in the former, there would be one comment per OS (the classic comment would be kept for compatibility purposes). In the first case, having only CommentMBS make the other comment inaccessible. I ask because, in my mind, I always thought it was actually the first case. _______________________________________________ Mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info mailing list [email protected] https://ml01.ispgateway.de/mailman/listinfo/mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info
