Hi Christian. How did you check the results? Was it visually or did you compare the binary output from the two versions?
Did you notice any performance improvements when you switched to integers? Regards, Kev. ----- Original Message ----- From: Christian Schmitz <[email protected]> To: MBS Real Studio Plugin List <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2011, 12:49 Subject: Re: Re-4: [MBS] Downsize large picture with yielding w/low memory usage? Am 24.11.2011 um 12:55 schrieb MGE Info: >> I did some comparisons and it looks like it doesn't have a visible effect. >> But please test when the next pr is available. > Wouldnt it be moreexisting code friendly, to add a Parameter using old and > new behavior? > In my case there would be to much to test. That would double my code base here. Really, the temp picture needs to store the pixel values. 0 to 255 per channel. We used to put them in doubles. So a value of 0.5 would be preserved in the temporary picture. But I made test here with scaling up and down with old vs. new plugin and I didn't see a difference in the results. Please test. Greetings Christian -- See you in Orlando, Florida for Real World 2012 More details and registration here: http://www.realsoftware.com/community/realworld.php _______________________________________________ Mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info mailing list [email protected] https://ml01.ispgateway.de/mailman/listinfo/mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info _______________________________________________ Mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info mailing list [email protected] https://ml01.ispgateway.de/mailman/listinfo/mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info
