|
I could _really_ use AssertNotEqual...
I think it's worth migrating these over. Out of
curiosity, would there be any legal issues with porting the code from NUnit
instead of implementing work-alikes? Seems to me the xUnit's would benefit
from a little consolidation.
Thinking ahead, some interesting avenues open up with C#
3.0 _expression_ trees that may obviate most of the specialized asserts. I
have been thinking it would be worthwhile to build 1.1 and 2.0 versions of
MbUnit using conditional compilation and improved build scripts. When C#
3.0 comes along, we can add support for that in the same way. I don't like
the MbUnit.Framework.1.1 assembly approach.
Jeff. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Haack Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: MbUnit Re: Asserts Definitely
useful. Kind of helpful to have them just for the sake of migrating from
NUnit to MbUnit. When I made the switch, I had update all my unit tests that
were using AreNotEqual. Phil From:
Hi, While writing up a blog post on MbUnit asserts I noticed
the following that NUnit has compared to
MbUnit.
Type
Asserts
We do have a lot of asserts on them as well :) and we
may have some cross over (point it out if thats the case) but
it's struck me that we may have some missing functionality so I would like
to know if these are of value to you in your testing toolbox and if you want
them added? Andy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MbUnit.User" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- MbUnit Re: Asserts Jeff Brown
- MbUnit Re: Asserts Andrew Stopford
- MbUnit Re: Asserts Andrew Stopford
