Haven't been flowing this converstation sorry. I'm also super busy at the moment, however if no one else is looking into the problem then I might be able to give it a few hours in the morning.
Got 3-4 other things which are still ongoing - but i will have a look, but can't promise anything. If anyone objects, or has any input then give me a shout. Guessing I will look into this shadow copy like Cons to start with... Ben On 20/09/06, Jeff Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well the MbUnit.Cons application has a shadow copy flag. Perhaps we just > need to provide an equivalent option in the GUI. Possibly make it the > default. > > Jeff. > > ________________________________ > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jay Flowers > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 5:43 AM > To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: MbUnit Fwd: FW: Weblog comment by 'Michael K. Campbell' from > 'http://blog.angrypets.com' on 'MbUnit - Unit Testing on Crack' > > > Hey, I forgot that Andy was out for a while. Can you guys pounce on this? > Please?!? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jay Flowers < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sep 20, 2006 5:06 AM > Subject: Fwd: FW: Weblog comment by 'Michael K. Campbell' from > 'http://blog.angrypets.com' on 'MbUnit - Unit Testing on Crack' > To: Andrew Stopford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Scott Hanselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hey, > I am really busy this morning and I can't take the time that this deserves. > Andy can you tackle this please? > > Thanks, > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Scott Hanselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sep 20, 2006 1:26 AM > Subject: FW: Weblog comment by 'Michael K. Campbell' from ' > http://blog.angrypets.com ' on 'MbUnit - Unit Testing on Crack' > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Jump in here? > > ________________________________ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tue 9/19/2006 7:56 PM > To: Scott Hanselman > Subject: Weblog comment by 'Michael K. Campbell' from ' > http://blog.angrypets.com' on 'MbUnit - Unit Testing on Crack' > > > > > Crap! I clicked on the link to the new facelift and started to party. Only > I've been using the recent version for a little while now... so I got all > excited for nothing *sniff*. > > The ONLY thing that could make MbUnit better would be if it would somehow > magically release assemblies (or pull them in via Shadow Copy) each time it > finished a batch of tests. I'm sadly quite an iterative tester at points and > find myself constantly wanting to rebuild/tweak/etc, and therefore have to > keep unloading and reloading my assemblies in the GUI otherwise I can't > build correctly... > > But yeah, stellar tool. > Comments page: > http://www.hanselman.com/blog/CommentView.aspx?guid=C7DF62F7-688C-49C9-8977-9A0E481D9BC0 > > Delete Comment: > http://www.hanselman.com/blog/deleteItem.ashx?entryid=C7DF62F7-688C-49C9-8977-9A0E481D9BC0&commentId=26143ea3-36fd-4b5c-80dd-7dd0b22d75fc > > > -- > Jay Flowers > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > http://jayflowers.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > Jay Flowers > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > http://jayflowers.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MbUnit.User" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
