Hi, This relates to my next stage of thinking in offering 2.4 in a 1.1 and 2.0release, with each compiled to that version of the framework and in 2.0 case offering features that are related to 2.0 (such as a .NET 2.0rollback).
Thoughts welcome here. Andy On 11/27/06, Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Relating somewhat to Andy's last post on dropping .NET 1.0 support > (fine with me by the way), I'd really like to use the > System.Configuration namespace to implement the enhancement I entered > in MBUNIT-65, which is about making the GUI remember the last assembly > and even tests that you ran. However, System.Configuration requires > .NET 2.0. > > Theoretically this only means that you'd need 2.0 on your machine to > run the GUI - it doesn't mean that the core MbUnit DLL's, your tests, > or any of the code being tested needs to support 2.0. > > Any thoughts? > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MbUnit.User" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
