Hi I wondered why NUnitForms is not on the list as NUnit only (only a wery old port to MbUnit seems to exists)
BTW this is the only reason I have for not using MbUnit br Jens On Apr 18, 10:52 am, "Andrew Stopford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > btw If anyone has any corrections or additions then please do email them on. > > Andy > > On 4/18/07, Andrew Stopford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > I'll try and present an honest and level arguement for you. Choosing a > > framework really depends on your what your testing requirements are for now > > and the future. Some of the features I wil mention below will need you to > > research further but hopefully you can match your requirements against the > > features. > > > All 3 frameworks (as well csUnit and ZaneBug) have the same set of basic > > asserts and fixtures. > > All 3 frameworks work with TestDriven.net which is the very best way of > > running unit tests in VS. > > MSTest is bound until VS Orcas to the VSTS additions of VS, when Orcas > > ships it will be available in the pro sku additions of VS. csUnit, > > ZaneBug, MbUnit and NUnit all work on all sku additions of VS2003 and > > VS2005. > > MbUnit and NUnit both have collection and array asserts (ZaneBug and > > MSTest may have collection asserts, can someone confirm that?). > > MbUnit and NUnit have fixtures for setting the running order, excludes and > > includes (I think ZaneBug has something like this too, Sean ?? :)) > > MbUnit has a greatest degree of asserts of all frameworks including > > asserrts for perf, reflection, compiler and others. > > MbUnit and MSTest have the ability to test private methods, MbUnit has a > > richer support for this. > > MbUnit and MSTest have the ability data drive unit tests, MSTest can do > > this from a database or XML file, MbUnit is currantly XML file only. > > MbUnit is the only framework to support row testing and pair wise testing > > (row testing is on the ZaneBug road map). > > ZaneBug has the richest support of all frameworks for performance > > indicators and testing. > > NUnit is the only framework to support constraints. > > NUnit is the only framework to run on Mono (on the MbUnit and ZaneBug > > roadmaps). > > NUnit as the oldest framework has the greatest degree of articles (MbUnit > > as a much younger project is building this up with every passing month), > > books and the biggest adoption within test and CI tools (however NUnit and > > MbUnit are supported natively with the mostly widely used CI server, CCNet). > > > I hope that helps. > > > Andy > > > On 4/18/07, Mahes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm rather new to unit testing. > > > > And I have to choose a testing platform now. > > > > Anybody who can tell me what MBUnit can do that NUnit or mstest(Visual > > > Studio for Software testers) can't do? > > > I don't want answers like: It's great, It's the best.. but I'm > > > looking for the differences on wich I can base my choice. > > > > TIA- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MbUnit.User" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
