Were you running those MbUnit 2.4 tests using Gallio as well (via Gallio's
MbUnit v2 adapter) or with the native tools.

In any case, performance is a big ticket issue for Gallio in the v3.1
timeframe.  Basically, we've learned a lot from the v3.0.* experience, we've
got some great tools, but we have to tweak a few of our early assumptions.

When that's done... it'll be awesome.  ;-)

Jeff.

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, ARKBAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I have on a previous upgrade from MbUnit 2.4 to 3.0.2 or 3.0.3 (I forget
> which). I have about 1000 unit tests, which take 45 secs on MbUnit 2.4
> and 2+ minutes on MbUnit 3. I'm using .Net 2.0 and none of the
> frameworks you are using, so I think its MbUnit.
>
> I plan to test with MbUnit 3.0.5 but by the time I get a chance 3.0.6
> will probably be released : (
>
> ARKBAN
>
> James Kovacs wrote:
> > On a current project, I upgraded from MbUnit 2.4 to Gallio 3.0.5. Test
> > execution times skyrocketed. The test suite is a reasonable size at
> > 694 tests - mostly unit with some integration. I tried running the
> > test suite under Gallio compiled for MbUnit2.4 and MbUnit3. The tests
> > are run with NCover2 integration using the Gallio NAnt task.
> >
> > MbUnit3 under NCover2
> > Run#1 272.553s
> > Run#2 278.308s
> >
> > MbUnit2.4 under NCover2
> > Run#1 165.769s
> > Run#2 145.258s
> >
> > The only code difference is correcting some minor syntactic
> > differences between MbUnit2.4 and MbUnit3, notably the
> > ApartmentStateAttribute on two test classes. Unfortunately I can't
> > share the code since it is a client project. I'm wondering if anyone
> > else has encountered this when upgrading to MbUnit3? I'm using a
> > fairly standard tool stack - .NET 3.5, Rhino Mocks, Oracle, Castle
> > Windsor, ... I just can't quite understand why MbUnit3 performance is
> > so much worse than MbUnit2.4. On the build server, which has a lot
> > less horsepower than my dev machine, it's taking around 8 minutes for
> > the build with MbUnit3 whereas it was around 4 minutes with MbUnit2.4.
> > Because of this, I've had to revert to Gallio running MbUnit2.4. Any
> > thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> > >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MbUnit.User" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to