It will be slower with NCover. Depending on the amount of code covered it can be much slower than otherwise.
In addition to the runtime overhead NCover may take a few minutes to save and to merge coverage reports. Jeff On Sep 7, 2009, at 1:54 PM, "Bruno Wouters" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Are there any known issues with ncover runner and the Parallelizable > attribute? Running the tests locally without ncover (just in visual > studio with testdriven.net) works great. > > In teamcity with ncover it seems to be extremely slow. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Greets, > > Bruno > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MbUnit.User" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mbunituser?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
