> So far, mcserv and the directory tree got no votes. The Windows port and
> the background operations got 2 votes each. Its interesting because the
> background code crashes for me (try overwriting a file in the background),
> but I didn't get a single bugreport about it.
Fixed:
===============================
--- background.c
+++ background.c
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ background_attention (int fd, void *clos
/* Handle the call */
if (type == Return_Integer){
- if (have_ctx)
+ if (!have_ctx)
switch (argc){
case 1:
result = (*(int (*)(int, char *))routine)(Background, data [0]);
===============================
It was a guaranteed segfault on any message from the background process.
The bug was in the code since January 1999 - for more than 3 years, and
nobody has reported it, as far as I remember. Well, I can imagine that
the users copying from ftp would always use a separate directory.
A user of the tree has been found, so the remaining question is whether
anybody uses mcserv.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
_______________________________________________
Mc-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
