* Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Sun, 22 Dec 2002]: > Relying on timeout seems like bad idea to me. > Its against UI guidelines (they say things should > not depend on timing, except in games).
That makes sense in general. That's why these timeout based features should be optional. > Mutt cerainly waits for you to press <enter>, no timeouts there. It the app waits for enter, then it also must provide an additional visual feedback - display the processed numbers somewhere (like mutt does). The timeout based solution has the advantage, that it provides the visual feedback, because the selection cursor moves immediately as the keys are pressed. Implementing that enter based approach would also be much more complicated, you would need an additional text input widget somewhere. It also has no advantage for those people who don't mind the timeout. It only imposes an unnecessary additional key press on them. I am just happy with the current implementation. -- Tomas Styblo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC97EA4B6 _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
