Hello guys, Andrew V. Samoilov wrote:
Applied above patch, and though the pach may have is own merit for being applied anyway -
Can you test attached patch? I eliminate ftell()s, it is one of the possible bottlenecks.
--- src/man2hlp.c Wed Jan 15 16:25:46 2003
+++ src/man2hlp.c Wed Jan 15 16:34:15 2003
@@ -61,38 +61,9 @@ struct node {
the runaway mc.hlp.it still exists on my configuration. (see thread).
However, in a trial & error / process of elimination approach, I swapped out the
.../doc/it/mc.1.in (for the) .../doc/pl/mc.1.in and (though nobody in Italy would
be satisfied with the results) the resulting mc.hlp.it did not suffer from the same
condition. So, Could there be some flaw in ...doc/it/mc.1.in ?
Tribhuvan
_______________________________________________
Mc-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
