Hello, Adam! > It is worth noting, that the getlocalcopy has already supported file > 'extension' as a suffix (mclocalcopyXXXXX.tgz in our case, btw it was > implemented in a quite ugly way: 6 lines of code could be easily > substituted with simple strrchr), but it is not enough IMO: > > * Something we call 'extension' is not native to the *nix > nomenclature, in unix filename is atomic (of course we treat part > after the last dot as the 'extension', but it is mostly > conventional) - AFAIK, correct me if I'm wrong...
If you preserve the whole filename, you are more likely to have spaces for some other special characters in the filename. Some programs have problems with spaces in the filename (e.g. rpm 4.1). Even worse, some programs could be exploited by giving them bogus filenames as arguments. I like your idea, but the security issue should be addressed (actually, it exists already because the extension can have bad stuff too). -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel