Follow-up Comment #10, bug #12223 (project mc): Felix,
There are at least 2 people who share this opinion, as *I* (not Oswald) was the one to close the bug. Further, comment #2 clearly states: "Please reopen if you have a patch to submit ;) ." What I am trying to achieve is to separate the wheat from the chaf. I don't think anyboy will be looking at this issue soon, we are short on developers - when was the last time *you* reviewed or submitted a patch? - hence I closed this bug, so it's easier for me to see the forest through the trees. Same happened for a report from Roland, a valued and active developer, because his report was so closely related to another bug that they should probably be fixed in conjunction. A closed bug does not show up in the default query view and thus makes it easier to keep an overview. This doesn't mean relevant patches will not be considered, but I don't see any (yet). If it really makes you feel better I could reopen this bug and tag it "Analyzed" and "Postponed", but practically that wouldn't make a difference, except for the report showing up in a view that I am trying to unclutter. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=12223> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel