On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:41:02AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:09 +0200, Roland Illig wrote: > > Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > No. In particular, I don't think we need to support Win64, where long > > > cannot hold a pointer. > > > > Why not? What's wrong about that? > > Because it's a common assumption that long can hold any pointer. > which doesn't really change the fact, that it is wrong ... size_t isn't exactly a new concept.
-- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel