Hi Pavel, On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 03:20, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > I would suggest if such a step would be made we use the MC_4_6_1_PRE for > > this. HEAD is somewhat experimental. > > I disagree. We would confuse everybody. The 4.6.1 branch should be > released as 4.6.1 if at all (maybe as 4.6.2 if there we unofficial 4.6.1 > releases). > > It's the experimental code that should become 5.0 or 4.7 or whatever we > choose. If it's too unstable, we could make some prereleases.
?? Aren't you saying what I'm saying? MC_4_6_1_PRE should become mc-4.6.1 and HEAD should be used for the release of 4.7 (the viewer code is not well tested so I believe it shouldn't be used for 4.6.1). Where do we disagree? Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel